Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:24:13 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE and init again |
| |
Hi Jamie,
On 08/14, Jamie Iles wrote: > > > > Not sure, let me think a bit more... and this is not enough anyway. > > > > > > perhaps we should start with this simple change, but the "real" fix > > > needs a lot of cleanups, although I am not sure if we will ever do this. > > > > Okay, sounds good. I'm happy to spend more time looking at this if you > > have suggestions - in the context of namespaces and containers this > > seems more relevant than when it was just the system init that we were > > protecting. > > Any objections to moving ahead with this patch?
Oh, sorry.
OK, lets do this simple change then try to improve this logic further.
I'm afraid you need to re-send your patch, sorry.
Oleg.
| |