[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE and init again
Hi Jamie,

On 08/14, Jamie Iles wrote:
> > > Not sure, let me think a bit more... and this is not enough anyway.
> > >
> > > perhaps we should start with this simple change, but the "real" fix
> > > needs a lot of cleanups, although I am not sure if we will ever do this.
> >
> > Okay, sounds good. I'm happy to spend more time looking at this if you
> > have suggestions - in the context of namespaces and containers this
> > seems more relevant than when it was just the system init that we were
> > protecting.
> Any objections to moving ahead with this patch?

Oh, sorry.

OK, lets do this simple change then try to improve this logic further.

I'm afraid you need to re-send your patch, sorry.


 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-14 18:24    [W:0.066 / U:1.948 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site