lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: twl: move header file out of I2C realm
    On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 08:03:52AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
    > On Thu, 06 Jul 2017, Thierry Reding wrote:
    >
    > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:02:10AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
    > > > include/linux/i2c is not for client devices. Move the header file to a
    > > > more appropriate location.
    > > >
    > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
    > > > ---
    > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h | 2 +-
    > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/iio/adc/twl4030-madc.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/input/keyboard/twl4030_keypad.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/input/misc/twl4030-pwrbutton.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 6 +++---
    > > > drivers/mfd/twl4030-audio.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/power/supply/twl4030_charger.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/pwm/pwm-twl-led.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/video/backlight/pandora_bl.c | 2 +-
    > > > drivers/watchdog/twl4030_wdt.c | 2 +-
    > > > include/linux/{i2c => mfd}/twl.h | 0
    > > > sound/soc/codecs/twl4030.c | 2 +-
    > > > 25 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
    > > > rename include/linux/{i2c => mfd}/twl.h (100%)
    > >
    > > I didn't see this get applied yet, so just in case anyone was waiting
    > > for me (this is trivial, so I don't think there's a need):
    >
    > You're not the last. :)

    Given the triviality of the change for non-MFD subsystems, can we apply
    this for 4.14?

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-08-13 15:38    [W:4.169 / U:0.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site