lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 2/5] i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure

> I'm surprised they didn't allow for slave clock stretching when
> communicating with a legacy i2c device, it will prohibit use of a rather
> large class of devices. :(

Yes, but I3C is push/pull IIRC.

> As for interrupts you are always free to wire up an out-of-band
> interrupt like before. :)

Yes, my wording was a bit too strong. It is possible, sure. Yet, I
understood that one of the features of I3C is to have in-band interrupt
support. We will see if the demand for backward compatibility or "saving
pins" is higher.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-01 19:27    [W:0.101 / U:1.744 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site