lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] gpio: drop unnecessary includes from include/linux/gpio/driver.h
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 15:48 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>>> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

>>> > If Linus is okay with the following proposal I would rather go with
>>> > it,
>>> > i.e. logical split the series to
>>> >
>>> > 1. Fix IRQ related headers inclusion
>>> > 2. Fix pinconf-generic.h inclusion
>>> > 3. Fix OF headers inclusion (btw, of_gpio.h is not enough there?)
>>>
>>> That works fine with me, but also one big patch actually, I do not
>>> want to make it too much work to refactor obviously incorrect things.
>>>
>>> As soon as we have rough consensus on this and the build robot
>>> are happy I will apply it to GPIO and also pull it into the pinctrl
>>> subsystem.
>>
>> For me priorities like this:
>> 1) it works after the patch being applied (no regressions);
>> 2) it makes code cleaner at the end;
>> 3) it is presented in logically split parts.
>>
>> So, as long as 1) and 2) are satisfied I can neglect on 3).
>
> We are in violent agreement :D

What I would like to say is that is up to you after all :-)
For me looks better to split.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-01 13:06    [W:0.055 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site