lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] f2fs: no need to create issue_discard_thread if it exists
From
Date
Hi Yunlong,

It looks there is no way to create discard thread redundantly,
so here we don't need to check this?

Thanks,

On 2017/7/6 19:05, Yunlong Song wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 4c246e3..b48d004 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1417,6 +1417,8 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>
> if (SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info) {
> dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> + if (dcc->f2fs_issue_discard)
> + return err;
> goto init_thread;
> }
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-06 15:18    [W:0.265 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site