Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:42:34 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [tip:locking/urgent] locking/rwsem-spinlock: Fix EINTR branch in __down_write_common() |
| |
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 09:28:58AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > It's more straightforward to just do the canonical sem->count >= 0 test that we do > elsewhere in the rwsem-spinlock code. > > PeterZ, what's your preference?
Leave it as is.. it doesn't matter (the 0 case shouldn't happen) and as you say >= 0 is what most other code does.
| |