lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v5 6/6] seccomp: Selftest for detection of filter flag support
Date
Userspace needs to be able to reliably detect the support of a filter
flag. A good way of doing that is by attempting to enter filter mode,
with the flag bit(s) in question set, and a NULL pointer for the args
parameter of seccomp(2). EFAULT indicates that the flag is valid and
EINVAL indicates that the flag is invalid.

This patch adds a selftest that can be used to test this method of
detection in userspace.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
---

* Changes since v4:
- This is a new patch

tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 040e875..d221437 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -1885,6 +1885,64 @@ TEST(seccomp_syscall_mode_lock)
}
}

+/* Test detection of known and unknown filter flags. Userspace needs to be able
+ * to check if a filter flag is support by the current kernel and a good way of
+ * doing that is by attempting to enter filter mode, with the flag bit in
+ * question set, and a NULL pointer for the _args_ parameter. EFAULT indicates
+ * that the flag is valid and EINVAL indicates that the flag is invalid.
+ */
+TEST(detect_seccomp_filter_flags)
+{
+ unsigned int flags[] = { SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC,
+ SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG };
+ unsigned int flag, all_flags;
+ int i;
+ long ret;
+
+ /* Test detection of known-good filter flags */
+ for (i = 0, all_flags = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(flags); i++) {
+ flag = flags[i];
+ ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL);
+ ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) {
+ TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!");
+ }
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
+ EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) {
+ TH_LOG("Failed to detect that a known-good filter flag (0x%X) is supported!",
+ flag);
+ }
+
+ all_flags |= flag;
+ }
+
+ /* Test detection of all known-good filter flags */
+ ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, all_flags, NULL);
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
+ EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) {
+ TH_LOG("Failed to detect that all known-good filter flags (0x%X) are supported!",
+ all_flags);
+ }
+
+ /* Test detection of an unknown filter flag */
+ flag = -1;
+ ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL);
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
+ EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno) {
+ TH_LOG("Failed to detect that an unknown filter flag (0x%X) is unsupported!",
+ flag);
+ }
+
+ /* Test detection of an unknown filter flag that may simply need to be
+ * added to this test */
+ flag = flags[ARRAY_SIZE(flags) - 1] << 1;
+ ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL);
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
+ EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno) {
+ TH_LOG("Failed to detect that an unknown filter flag (0x%X) is unsupported! Does a new flag need to be added to this test?",
+ flag);
+ }
+}
+
TEST(TSYNC_first)
{
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
--
2.7.4
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-28 22:57    [W:0.202 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site