[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 05:56:59AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:14:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:36:12PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > This horse is already out, so trying to shut the gate won't be effective.
> >
> > So I'm not convinced it is. The mprotect() hack isn't portable as we've
> > established and on x86 where it does work, it doesn't (much) perturb
> > tasks not related to our process because we keep a tight mm_cpumask().
> Wrong. People are using it today, portable or not. If we want them
> to stop using it, we need to give them an alternative. Period.

What's wrong? The mprotect() hack isn't portable, nor does it perturb
other users much.

I would much rather they use this than your
synchronize_sched_expedited() thing. Its much better behaved. And
they'll run into pain the moment they start using ARM,PPC,S390,etc..

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-27 15:38    [W:0.085 / U:24.276 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site