lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 02/13] xen/pvcalls: connect to the backend
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 7/25/2017 5:21 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Implement the probe function for the pvcalls frontend. Read the
> > supported versions, max-page-order and function-calls nodes from
> > xenstore.
> >
> > Introduce a data structure named pvcalls_bedata. It contains pointers to
> > the command ring, the event channel, a list of active sockets and a list
> > of passive sockets. Lists accesses are protected by a spin_lock.
> >
> > Introduce a waitqueue to allow waiting for a response on commands sent
> > to the backend.
> >
> > Introduce an array of struct xen_pvcalls_response to store commands
> > responses.
> >
> > Only one frontend<->backend connection is supported at any given time
> > for a guest. Store the active frontend device to a static pointer.
> >
> > Introduce a stub functions for the event handler.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@aporeto.com>
> > CC: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
> > CC: jgross@suse.com
> > ---
> > drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 153
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 153 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> > index a8d38c2..5e0b265 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,29 @@
> > #include <xen/xenbus.h>
> > #include <xen/interface/io/pvcalls.h>
> > +#define PVCALLS_INVALID_ID (UINT_MAX)
>
> Unnecessary parentheses

OK


> > +#define RING_ORDER XENBUS_MAX_RING_GRANT_ORDER
>
> PVCALLS_RING_ORDER?

Sure


> > +#define PVCALLS_NR_REQ_PER_RING __CONST_RING_SIZE(xen_pvcalls,
> > XEN_PAGE_SIZE)
> > +
> > +struct pvcalls_bedata {
> > + struct xen_pvcalls_front_ring ring;
> > + grant_ref_t ref;
> > + int irq;
> > +
> > + struct list_head socket_mappings;
> > + struct list_head socketpass_mappings;
> > + spinlock_t pvcallss_lock;
> > +
> > + wait_queue_head_t inflight_req;
> > + struct xen_pvcalls_response rsp[PVCALLS_NR_REQ_PER_RING];
> > +};
> > +struct xenbus_device *pvcalls_front_dev;
>
> static

good point, I'll fix


> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t pvcalls_front_event_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct xenbus_device_id pvcalls_front_ids[] = {
> > { "pvcalls" },
> > { "" }
> > @@ -33,12 +56,142 @@ static int pvcalls_front_remove(struct xenbus_device
> > *dev)
> > static int pvcalls_front_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> > const struct xenbus_device_id *id)
> > {
> > + int ret = -EFAULT, evtchn, ref = -1, i;
> > + unsigned int max_page_order, function_calls, len;
> > + char *versions;
> > + grant_ref_t gref_head = 0;
> > + struct xenbus_transaction xbt;
> > + struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata = NULL;
> > + struct xen_pvcalls_sring *sring;
> > +
> > + if (pvcalls_front_dev != NULL) {
> > + dev_err(&dev->dev, "only one PV Calls connection
> > supported\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + versions = xenbus_read(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, "versions", &len);
> > + if (!len)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + if (strcmp(versions, "1")) {
> > + kfree(versions);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + kfree(versions);
> > + ret = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend,
> > + "max-page-order", "%u", &max_page_order);
> > + if (ret <= 0)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + if (max_page_order < RING_ORDER)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + ret = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend,
> > + "function-calls", "%u", &function_calls);
> > + if (ret <= 0 || function_calls != 1)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + pr_info("%s max-page-order is %u\n", __func__, max_page_order);
> > +
> > + bedata = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pvcalls_bedata), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!bedata)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&bedata->inflight_req);
> > + for (i = 0; i < PVCALLS_NR_REQ_PER_RING; i++)
> > + bedata->rsp[i].req_id = PVCALLS_INVALID_ID;
> > +
> > + sring = (struct xen_pvcalls_sring *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL |
> > + __GFP_ZERO);
> > + if (!sring)
> > + goto error;
> > + SHARED_RING_INIT(sring);
> > + FRONT_RING_INIT(&bedata->ring, sring, XEN_PAGE_SIZE);
> > +
> > + ret = xenbus_alloc_evtchn(dev, &evtchn);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error;
> > +
> > + bedata->irq = bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler(evtchn,
> > + pvcalls_front_event_handler,
> > + 0, "pvcalls-frontend", dev);
> > + if (bedata->irq < 0) {
> > + ret = bedata->irq;
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = gnttab_alloc_grant_references(1, &gref_head);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto error;
> > + bedata->ref = ref = gnttab_claim_grant_reference(&gref_head);
>
> Is ref really needed?

No, I'll remove it


> > + if (ref < 0)
> > + goto error;
> > + gnttab_grant_foreign_access_ref(ref, dev->otherend_id,
> > + virt_to_gfn((void *)sring), 0);
> > +
> > + again:
> > + ret = xenbus_transaction_start(&xbt);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, ret, "starting transaction");
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > + ret = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "version", "%u", 1);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error_xenbus;
> > + ret = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "ring-ref", "%d", ref);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error_xenbus;
> > + ret = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "port", "%u",
> > + evtchn);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error_xenbus;
> > + ret = xenbus_transaction_end(xbt, 0);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> > + goto again;
> > + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, ret, "completing transaction");
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > +
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bedata->socket_mappings);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bedata->socketpass_mappings);
> > + spin_lock_init(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> > + dev_set_drvdata(&dev->dev, bedata);
> > + pvcalls_front_dev = dev;
> > + xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateInitialised);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > +
> > + error_xenbus:
> > + xenbus_transaction_end(xbt, 1);
> > + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, ret, "writing xenstore");
> > + error:
> > + pvcalls_front_remove(dev);
>
> I think patch 12 (where you implement cleanup) could be moved before this one.

I'll move the patch


> I also think you are leaking bedata on error paths.

bedata is freed by pvcalls_front_remove (kfree(bedata)), why do you say
so?


> > + return ret;
> > }
> > static void pvcalls_front_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> > enum xenbus_state backend_state)
> > {
> > + switch (backend_state) {
> > + case XenbusStateReconfiguring:
> > + case XenbusStateReconfigured:
> > + case XenbusStateInitialising:
> > + case XenbusStateInitialised:
> > + case XenbusStateUnknown:
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case XenbusStateInitWait:
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case XenbusStateConnected:
> > + xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateConnected);
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case XenbusStateClosed:
> > + if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
> > + break;
> > + /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */
> > + case XenbusStateClosing:
> > + xenbus_frontend_closed(dev);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > }
> > static struct xenbus_driver pvcalls_front_driver = {

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-27 02:26    [W:0.125 / U:14.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site