lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.12 099/196] ipmi:ssif: Add missing unlock in error branch
Date
4.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>

commit 4495ec6d770e1bca7a04e93ac453ab6720c56c5d upstream.

When getting flags, a response to a different message would
result in a deadlock because of a missing unlock. Add that
unlock and a comment. Found by static analysis.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
@@ -761,6 +761,11 @@ static void msg_done_handler(struct ssif
result, len, data[2]);
} else if (data[0] != (IPMI_NETFN_APP_REQUEST | 1) << 2
|| data[1] != IPMI_GET_MSG_FLAGS_CMD) {
+ /*
+ * Don't abort here, maybe it was a queued
+ * response to a previous command.
+ */
+ ipmi_ssif_unlock_cond(ssif_info, flags);
pr_warn(PFX "Invalid response getting flags: %x %x\n",
data[0], data[1]);
} else {

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-25 21:53    [W:0.543 / U:15.840 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site