Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:20:25 +0100 | From | Juri Lelli <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Update last_update from sugov_set_iowait_boost() |
| |
Hi Viresh,
On 18/07/17 10:24, Viresh Kumar wrote: > sg_cpu->last_update is always updated right after we call > sugov_set_iowait_boost() and its better to update it from that routine > itself. This makes it more readable. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > index 29a397067ffa..63557b9f36b6 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ static void sugov_set_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time, > if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) > sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0; > } > + > + sg_cpu->last_update = time; > } > > static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, unsigned long *util, > @@ -219,7 +221,6 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time, > bool busy; > > sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags); > - sg_cpu->last_update = time; > > if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) > return; > @@ -299,7 +300,6 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time, > sg_cpu->flags = flags; > > sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags); > - sg_cpu->last_update = time;
It actually belongs here, IMHO. We update other fields (util, max, flags) before looking at iowait. Why hiding the time update into a function dealing with only one of such fields?
Best,
- Juri
| |