[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 02/10] cpufreq: provide data for frequency-invariant load-tracking support
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 02:09:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Anyway, if everyone agrees that doing it in the core is the way to go (Peter?),
> why don't you introduce a __weak function for setting policy->cur and
> override it from your arch so as to call arch_set_freq_scale() from there?

So I'm terminally backlogged and my recent break didn't help any with

I'm at a total loss as to what is proposed here and why we need it. I
tried reading both the Changelog and patch but came up empty.

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-10 11:31    [W:0.154 / U:2.480 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site