Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] include: warn for inconsistent endian config definition | From | Babu Moger <> | Date | Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:39:03 -0500 |
| |
On 6/9/2017 9:11 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Babu, > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Babu Moger <babu.moger@oracle.com> wrote: >> On 6/9/2017 2:16 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> >>> wrote: >>>>> Here is the original discussion >>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg178101.html >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@oracle.com> >>>>> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> Yes. Got it. So patch #1 is fine. But, patch #2 might cause regressions. >> Should I drop patch 2. > No, it should be applied, and regressions should be fixed.
Geert, Ok. Sure. I will resubmit the patch mentioning all the files(base.c, fdt.c etc..) that are affected by this change. thanks > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds
| |