Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation | From | Manfred Spraul <> | Date | Fri, 9 Jun 2017 06:24:04 +0200 |
| |
Hi Davidlohr,
On 06/08/2017 10:09 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > Yes, this would be a prerequisite for ipc; which I initially thought > didn't > take a performance hit. > Did you see a regression for ipc?
The fast paths don't use the refcount, it is only used for rare situations: - GETALL, SETALL for large arrays - alloc undo
-- Manfred
| |