lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation
From
Date
Hi Davidlohr,

On 06/08/2017 10:09 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> Yes, this would be a prerequisite for ipc; which I initially thought
> didn't
> take a performance hit.
>
Did you see a regression for ipc?

The fast paths don't use the refcount, it is only used for rare situations:
- GETALL, SETALL for large arrays
- alloc undo

--
Manfred

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-12 01:40    [W:0.151 / U:1.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site