lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 4/8] mfd: hi6421-pmic: add support for HiSilicon Hi6421v530
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2017, Guodong Xu wrote:
>
> > Add support for HiSilicon Hi6421v530 PMIC. Hi6421v530 communicates with
> > main SoC via memory-mapped I/O.
> >
> > Hi6421v530 and Hi6421 are PMIC chips from the same vendor, HiSilicon,
> > but at different revisions. They share the same memory-mapped I/O
> > design. They differ in integrated devices, such as regulator details,
> > LDO voltage points.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoyin <hw.wangxiaoyin@hisilicon.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/hi6421-pmic-core.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > include/linux/mfd/hi6421-pmic.h | 5 +++
> > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/hi6421-pmic-core.c b/drivers/mfd/hi6421-pmic-core.c
> > index b1139d4..4568a43 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/hi6421-pmic-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/hi6421-pmic-core.c
>
> [...]
>
> > static int hi6421_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct hi6421_pmic *pmic;
> > struct resource *res;
> > + const struct of_device_id *id;
> > + const struct mfd_cell *subdevs;
> > void __iomem *base;
> > - int ret;
> > + int n_subdevs, ret;
> > +
> > + id = of_match_device(of_hi6421_pmic_match, &pdev->dev);
> > + if (!id)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > pmic = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pmic), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!pmic)
> > @@ -57,18 +80,33 @@ static int hi6421_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return PTR_ERR(pmic->regmap);
> > }
> >
> > - /* set over-current protection debounce 8ms */
> > - regmap_update_bits(pmic->regmap, HI6421_OCP_DEB_CTRL_REG,
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmic);
> > +
> > + switch ((unsigned long)id->data) {
>
> Whilst this is not a blocker, it would be nicer to place this into a
> 'type' variable, in order to clarify what data you are using.
>

I will add that.
enum hi6421_type type;


>
> > + case HI6421:
> > + /* set over-current protection debounce 8ms */
> > + regmap_update_bits(pmic->regmap, HI6421_OCP_DEB_CTRL_REG,
> > (HI6421_OCP_DEB_SEL_MASK
> > | HI6421_OCP_EN_DEBOUNCE_MASK
> > | HI6421_OCP_AUTO_STOP_MASK),
> > (HI6421_OCP_DEB_SEL_8MS
> > | HI6421_OCP_EN_DEBOUNCE_ENABLE));
> >
> > - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmic);
> > + subdevs = hi6421_devs;
> > + n_subdevs = ARRAY_SIZE(hi6421_devs);
> > + break;
> > + case HI6421_V530:
> > + subdevs = hi6421v530_devs;
> > + n_subdevs = ARRAY_SIZE(hi6421v530_devs);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unknown device type %ld\n",
> > + (unsigned long)id->data);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> >
> > - ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, 0, hi6421_devs,
> > - ARRAY_SIZE(hi6421_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> > + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> > + subdevs, n_subdevs, NULL, 0, NULL);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add child devices: %d\n", ret);
> > return ret;
> > @@ -77,16 +115,10 @@ static int hi6421_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static const struct of_device_id of_hi6421_pmic_match_tbl[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "hisilicon,hi6421-pmic", },
> > - { },
> > -};
> > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_hi6421_pmic_match_tbl);
> > -
> > static struct platform_driver hi6421_pmic_driver = {
> > .driver = {
> > - .name = "hi6421_pmic",
> > - .of_match_table = of_hi6421_pmic_match_tbl,
> > + .name = "hi6421_pmic",
> > + .of_match_table = of_hi6421_pmic_match,
> > },
> > .probe = hi6421_pmic_probe,
> > };
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/hi6421-pmic.h b/include/linux/mfd/hi6421-pmic.h
> > index 587273e..2457438 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/hi6421-pmic.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/hi6421-pmic.h
> > @@ -38,4 +38,9 @@ struct hi6421_pmic {
> > struct regmap *regmap;
> > };
> >
> > +enum hi6421_type {
> > + HI6421 = 1,
> > + HI6421_V530 = 2,
> > +};
> > +
>
> As programmers we usually start counting at 0. Then you can rely on
> the C standard to populate the remaining values.
>
> Something like:
>
> enum hi6421_type {
> HI6421 = 0,
> HI6421_V530,
> };
>
> ... is more normal.


:) sure. thanks. I will do.

-Guodong

>
>
> > #endif /* __HI6421_PMIC_H */
>
> --
> Lee Jones
> Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-12 00:59    [W:0.073 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site