lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4][V3] Improve watchdog config for arch watchdogs
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:46:48PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
> Hi Don, Nicholas,
>
>
> On 6/6/2017 11:08 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > (adding Babu)
> >
> > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:26:55AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > Since last time:
> > >
> > > - Have the perf based hardlockup detector use arch_touch_nmi_watchdog()
> > > rather than hld_touch_nmi_watchdog(). This changes direction slightly
> > > to make the perf-based hard lockup detector an alternative that an
> > > arch may select, rather than standalone. This better reflects how the
> > > code works in practice).
> > >
> > > - Hopefully fixed the Kconfig options. There's still a bit of ugliness
> > > that will require another pass or two over interfaces and config
> > > scheme, but the idea is to make a minimal change to get the powerpc
> > > HLD in, which gives a reasonable starting point to improve things
> > > further.
> > Hi Babu,
> >
> > Does this patchset break sparc? Specifically patch3 with all the config
> Patches applies, compiles fine and also works fine for most part. However,
> there are few issues.

Thanks for the quick turnaround!

>
> We need to enter 'N' or 'Y' for SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR.
>
> *
> * Restart config...
> *
> *
> * Debug Lockups and Hangs
> *
> Detect Hard and Soft Lockups (LOCKUP_DETECTOR) [Y/n/?] y
> Detect Soft Lockups (SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR) [N/y] (NEW)
>
> For SPARC, softlockup is enabled by default earlier. May be we need to
> submit another patch to enable this in
>
> arch/sparc/configs/sparc64_defconfig. Not a big issue.

Hmm, I think the nmi_enable/disable stuff is wrapped into the
SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR code, so you might need it. Though Nick did create a
separate interface outside of SOFTLOCKUP to something similar. I believe
patch4 introduces nmi_reconfigure().

Not sure if the spirit of the sparc nmi_watchdog code wants SOFTLOCKUP or
not.

>
>
> Another issue.
> before that patch
>
> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog
> 1
> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
> 1
>
> After the patch
>
> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog
> 1
> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
> 0

Yes, that is what I thought. Thanks for confirming!

>
> I think this is mostly due to change in this code below.
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> unsigned long __read_mostly watchdog_enabled =
> SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED|NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED;
>
> Old code was like this
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG) || defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR)
> unsigned long __read_mostly watchdog_enabled =
> SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED|NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED;
> #else
> unsigned long __read_mostly watchdog_enabled = SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED;
> #endif
>
> SPARC defines CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG.


I am still working with Nick to deal with these config issues. But I am
going to keep this one in mind while we work through it.

Cheers,
Don

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-12 01:07    [W:1.037 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site