lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH RFC 12/26] arm64: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitions
Date
There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific
arch_spin_unlock_wait().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 58 ++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
index cae331d553f8..f445bd7f2b9f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -26,58 +26,6 @@
* The memory barriers are implicit with the load-acquire and store-release
* instructions.
*/
-static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- unsigned int tmp;
- arch_spinlock_t lockval;
- u32 owner;
-
- /*
- * Ensure prior spin_lock operations to other locks have completed
- * on this CPU before we test whether "lock" is locked.
- */
- smp_mb();
- owner = READ_ONCE(lock->owner) << 16;
-
- asm volatile(
-" sevl\n"
-"1: wfe\n"
-"2: ldaxr %w0, %2\n"
- /* Is the lock free? */
-" eor %w1, %w0, %w0, ror #16\n"
-" cbz %w1, 3f\n"
- /* Lock taken -- has there been a subsequent unlock->lock transition? */
-" eor %w1, %w3, %w0, lsl #16\n"
-" cbz %w1, 1b\n"
- /*
- * The owner has been updated, so there was an unlock->lock
- * transition that we missed. That means we can rely on the
- * store-release of the unlock operation paired with the
- * load-acquire of the lock operation to publish any of our
- * previous stores to the new lock owner and therefore don't
- * need to bother with the writeback below.
- */
-" b 4f\n"
-"3:\n"
- /*
- * Serialise against any concurrent lockers by writing back the
- * unlocked lock value
- */
- ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN(
- /* LL/SC */
-" stxr %w1, %w0, %2\n"
- __nops(2),
- /* LSE atomics */
-" mov %w1, %w0\n"
-" cas %w0, %w0, %2\n"
-" eor %w1, %w1, %w0\n")
- /* Somebody else wrote to the lock, GOTO 10 and reload the value */
-" cbnz %w1, 2b\n"
-"4:"
- : "=&r" (lockval), "=&r" (tmp), "+Q" (*lock)
- : "r" (owner)
- : "memory");
-}

#define arch_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_spin_lock(lock)

@@ -176,7 +124,11 @@ static inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)

static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
- smp_mb(); /* See arch_spin_unlock_wait */
+ /*
+ * Ensure prior spin_lock operations to other locks have completed
+ * on this CPU before we test whether "lock" is locked.
+ */
+ smp_mb(); /* ^^^ */
return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(READ_ONCE(*lock));
}

--
2.5.2
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-30 02:12    [W:0.236 / U:7.780 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site