lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] f2fs: fix ref of discard command
On 06/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2017/6/12 11:04, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch resolves kernel panic for xfstests/081, caused by recent f2fs_bug_on
> >
> > f2fs: add f2fs_bug_on in __remove_discard_cmd
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 86a0c1095939..a6d77388a806 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -1025,6 +1025,8 @@ static void __wait_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool wait_cond)
> > list_for_each_entry_safe(dc, tmp, wait_list, list) {
> > if (!wait_cond || (dc->state == D_DONE && !dc->ref)) {
> > wait_for_completion_io(&dc->wait);
> > + if (dc->state == D_DONE && dc->ref)
> > + dc->ref--;
>
> Should set dc->ref to 0 to avoid panic once we add other referrers?

Sorry, could you please explain this in more detail?

Thanks,

>
> Thanks,
>
> > __remove_discard_cmd(sbi, dc);
> > } else {
> > dc->ref++;
> >

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-14 16:27    [W:0.113 / U:0.856 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site