lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.9 081/119] ufs_extend_tail(): fix the braino in calling conventions of ufs_new_fragments()
Date
4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

commit 940ef1a0ed939c2ca029fca715e25e7778ce1e34 upstream.

... and it really needs splitting into "new" and "extend" cases, but that's for
later

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
fs/ufs/inode.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ufs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ufs/inode.c
@@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ ufs_extend_tail(struct inode *inode, u64

p = ufs_get_direct_data_ptr(uspi, ufsi, block);
tmp = ufs_new_fragments(inode, p, lastfrag, ufs_data_ptr_to_cpu(sb, p),
- new_size, err, locked_page);
+ new_size - (lastfrag & uspi->s_fpbmask), err,
+ locked_page);
return tmp != 0;
}


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-12 18:36    [W:0.355 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site