lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] tpm: Enable CLKRUN protocol for Braswell systems
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:39:20PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 07:22:59PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > + outb(0x80, 0xCC);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Make sure the above write is completed */
> > > > > + wmb();
> > > >
> > > > Why the wmb(). It doesn't do what the comment says! Also this code is x86
> > > > specific
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Memory barrier to enforce the order so that the outb() is
> > > completed, which ensures that the LPC clocks are running before
> > > sending any TPM command.
> >
> > wmb() doesn't do that. It merely ensures that the write has been posted
> > to the fabric. If as I suspect your LPC bus implements outb() as a
> > non-posted write you don't need the wmb().
>
> I think the point here is to bootstrap the sleeping LPC bus clock
> before a TPM command is issued, presumably because the auto-wakeup circuit
> is busted or something.
>
> For that purpose all that should be required is strong ordering of the
> outb relative to the other TPM commands at the LPC interface FIFO. I
> also think the wmb is not needed because outb is already defined to be
> strongly in order with respect to writel/readl ?
>
> Jason

writel AFAIK guarantees by itself strong RW ordering.

/Jarkko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-12 01:55    [W:0.124 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site