lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: get/put_cpu() usage in block/blk-mq.c
From
Date
On 05/09/2017 09:04 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-09 at 08:53 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 05/09/2017 12:07 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>> Hi Jens,
>>>
>>> I was about to fix up this splat..
>>>
>>> [ 445.022141] loop: module loaded
>>> [ 445.078116] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: loop0/3801
>>> [ 445.085873] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
>>> [ 445.091016] CPU: 7 PID: 3801 Comm: loop0 Tainted: G E 4.12.0-default #40
>>> [ 445.098838] Hardware name: IBM System x3550 M3 -[7944K3G]-/69Y5698 , BIOS -[D6E150AUS-1.10]- 12/15/2010
>>> [ 445.108564] Call Trace:
>>> [ 445.111016] dump_stack+0x65/0x89
>>> [ 445.114330] check_preemption_disabled+0xde/0xf0
>>> [ 445.118945] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
>>> [ 445.123300] blk_stat_add+0xb0/0x130
>>> [ 445.126876] __blk_mq_complete_request+0xb5/0x150
>>> [ 445.131575] blk_mq_complete_request+0x16/0x20
>>> [ 445.136020] loop_queue_work+0x5f/0xaa0 [loop]
>>> [ 445.140461] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x21/0x40
>>> [ 445.144816] ? finish_task_switch+0x85/0x270
>>> [ 445.149085] ? __schedule+0x291/0x8c0
>>> [ 445.152747] kthread_worker_fn+0xc2/0x1d0
>>> [ 445.156754] kthread+0x114/0x150
>>> [ 445.159983] ? __kthread_init_worker+0xb0/0xb0
>>> [ 445.164424] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
>>> [ 445.168085] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40
>>
>> Is it from this_cpu_ptr() in blk_stat_add()?
>
> Yeah.

So why is this complaining, doesn't rcu_read_lock() disable
preemption?

--
Jens Axboe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-10 21:18    [W:0.041 / U:1.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site