lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: wireless: ath: ath9k: remove unnecessary code
Hi Kalle,

Quoting Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>:

> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> writes:
>
>> The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's address.
>> So this test will always evaluate as true.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364903
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
>> index fb80ec8..5c3bc28 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
>> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ bool ath9k_hw_nvram_read(struct ath_hw *ah, u32
>> off, u16 *data)
>>
>> if (ah->eeprom_blob)
>> ret = ath9k_hw_nvram_read_firmware(ah->eeprom_blob, off, data);
>> - else if (pdata && !pdata->use_eeprom && pdata->eeprom_data)
>> + else if (pdata && !pdata->use_eeprom)
>> ret = ath9k_hw_nvram_read_pdata(pdata, off, data);
>> else
>> ret = common->bus_ops->eeprom_read(common, off, data);
>
> The patch may very well be valid (didn't check yet) but the commit log
> is gibberish for me.
>

Let me correct that and I'll send the patch again.

Thanks!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-10 21:18    [W:0.053 / U:2.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site