Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] fs: ubifs: set s_uuid in super block | From | Oleksij Rempel <> | Date | Tue, 9 May 2017 06:13:26 +0200 |
| |
On 05/02/2017 09:37 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Amir, > > Am 02.05.2017 um 09:19 schrieb Amir Goldstein: >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote: >>> Am 24.04.2017 um 17:47 schrieb Richard Weinberger: >>>>> So, if some flag should be implemented, who should do it? :) >>>> >>>> I'll not do it for you. ;) >>> >>> Please also see http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=149327990608749&w=2 >>> >> >> Richard, >> >> Considering the facts that: >> 1. I proposed the said flag and Al didn't think it was needed [1] >> 2. ext4 already sets s_uuid without any flag for a long time now >> 3. A similar patch was queued for v4.12 to set s_uuid for xfs without any flag >> >> I think it would be right to take Oleksij's patch as is. >> >> FYI, my current work on 'constant inode numbers for overlayfs' requires that >> underlying filesystem had set a non-zero s_uuid. Not sure if that matters for >> ubifs+overlayfs users. > > If VFS maintainers are fine with that, I'll take it. > From UBIFS' POV it does not matter much. :-)
Ping to VFS maintainers?
| |