lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 3.12 04/86] drm/vmwgfx: fix integer overflow in vmw_surface_define_ioctl()
Date
From: Li Qiang <liq3ea@gmail.com>

3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit e7e11f99564222d82f0ce84bd521e57d78a6b678 upstream.

In vmw_surface_define_ioctl(), the 'num_sizes' is the sum of the
'req->mip_levels' array. This array can be assigned any value from
the user space. As both the 'num_sizes' and the array is uint32_t,
it is easy to make 'num_sizes' overflow. The later 'mip_levels' is
used as the loop count. This can lead an oob write. Add the check of
'req->mip_levels' to avoid this.

Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liqiang6-s@360.cn>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
index a518493836a0..12969378c06e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
@@ -677,8 +677,11 @@ int vmw_surface_define_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
128;

num_sizes = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < DRM_VMW_MAX_SURFACE_FACES; ++i)
+ for (i = 0; i < DRM_VMW_MAX_SURFACE_FACES; ++i) {
+ if (req->mip_levels[i] > DRM_VMW_MAX_MIP_LEVELS)
+ return -EINVAL;
num_sizes += req->mip_levels[i];
+ }

if (num_sizes > DRM_VMW_MAX_SURFACE_FACES * DRM_VMW_MAX_MIP_LEVELS ||
num_sizes == 0)
--
2.12.2
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-04 11:07    [W:0.219 / U:10.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site