lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/13] PCI: Only treat non-pref mmio64 as pref if all bridges have MEM_64
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:04:57PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> If any bridge up to root only have 32bit pref mmio, We don't need to
> treat device non-pref mmio64 as as pref mmio64.

I don't understand the reasoning here.

Apparently it is only safe to put a non-prefetchable PCIe BAR in a
prefetchable window if all upstream bridges have a 64-bit prefetchable
window? Why is that? Why is it important that the prefetchable
window be 64-bit? I don't see this mentioned in the implementation
note.

Does this mean "PCI: Check pref compatible bit for mem64 resource of
PCIe device" can make unsafe assignments until we apply this patch?
If so, I don't want that sort of bisection hole.

What bad thing happens without this patch?

> We need to move pci_bridge_check_ranges calling early.
> For parent bridges pref mmio BAR may not allocated by BIOS, res flags
> is still 0, we need to have it correct set before we check them for
> child device resources.
>
> -v2: check all bus resources instead of just res[15].
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> index 3de66e6..b3fd314 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -735,6 +735,29 @@ int pci_claim_bridge_resource(struct pci_dev *bridge, int i)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static bool pci_up_path_over_pref_mem64(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +{
> + if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
> + return true;
> +
> + if (bus->self) {
> + int i;
> + bool found = false;
> + struct resource *res;
> +
> + pci_bus_for_each_resource(bus, res, i)
> + if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64) {
> + found = true;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!found)
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return pci_up_path_over_pref_mem64(bus->parent);
> +}
> +
> int pci_resource_pref_compatible(const struct pci_dev *dev,
> struct resource *res)
> {
> @@ -743,7 +766,8 @@ int pci_resource_pref_compatible(const struct pci_dev *dev,
>
> if ((res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) &&
> (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64) &&
> - dev->on_all_pcie_path)
> + dev->on_all_pcie_path &&
> + pci_up_path_over_pref_mem64(dev->bus))
> return res->flags | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
>
> return res->flags;
> @@ -1236,6 +1260,10 @@ void __pci_bus_size_bridges(struct pci_bus *bus, struct list_head *realloc_head)
> struct resource *b_res;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!pci_is_root_bus(bus) &&
> + (bus->self->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI)
> + pci_bridge_check_ranges(bus);
> +
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
> struct pci_bus *b = dev->subordinate;
> if (!b)
> @@ -1263,7 +1291,6 @@ void __pci_bus_size_bridges(struct pci_bus *bus, struct list_head *realloc_head)
> break;
>
> case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI:
> - pci_bridge_check_ranges(bus);
> if (bus->self->is_hotplug_bridge) {
> additional_io_size = pci_hotplug_io_size;
> additional_mem_size = pci_hotplug_mem_size;
> --
> 2.9.3
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-04 23:43    [W:0.156 / U:0.780 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site