lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [linux-next / tty] possible circular locking dependency detected
From
Date
On 05/22/17 12:27, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On 05/22/17 12:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:39:43PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> [ 1274.378287] ======================================================
>>> [ 1274.378289] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
>>> [ 1274.378290] 4.12.0-rc1-next-20170522-dbg-00007-gc09b2ab28b74-dirty
>>> #1317 Not tainted
>>> [ 1274.378291] ------------------------------------------------------
>>> [ 1274.378293] kworker/u8:5/111 is trying to acquire lock:
>>> [ 1274.378294] (&buf->lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff812f2831>]
>>> tty_buffer_flush+0x34/0x88
>>> [ 1274.378300]
>>> but task is already holding lock:
>>> [ 1274.378301] (&o_tty->termios_rwsem/1){++++..}, at:
>>> [<ffffffff812ee5c7>] isig+0x47/0xd2
>>> [ 1274.378307]
>>> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>>>
>
>> Any hint as to what you were doing when this happened?
>>
>> Does this also show up in 4.11?
>
> It's my patch "tty: fix port buffer locking" :-/
>
> At a glance, looks related to pty taking the lock on the other side in a
> different order. I'll have a closer look.

I can reproduce the lockdep report locally on v4.12-rc3. Looking at it now.


Vegard

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-29 12:45    [W:0.129 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site