lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [linux-next] PPC Lpar fail to boot with error hid: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
From
Date
On 05/25/2017 04:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2017 23:02:06 +1000 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>>
>> It'll be:
>>
>> ee35011fd032 ("initramfs: make initramfs honor CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT")
>
> And Andrew has asked me to drop that patch from linux-next which will
> happen today.

What approach do the kernel developers suggest I take here?

I would have thought letting it soak in linux-next for a release so
people could fix userspace bugs would be the next step, but this sounds
like that's not an option?

Is the behavior the patch implements wrong?

Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-26 08:25    [W:0.127 / U:25.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site