Messages in this thread | | | From | Gregory CLEMENT <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/6] gpio: dt-bindings: Add documentation for gpio controllers on Armada 7K/8K | Date | Tue, 23 May 2017 15:06:04 +0200 |
| |
Hi Linus,
On mar., mai 23 2017, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Gregory CLEMENT > <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> wrote: > >> Document the device tree binding for the gpio controllers found on the >> Marvell Armada 7K and Armada 8K SoCs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> > > This does not apply at all to the GPIO "devel" branch. > And that is a fairly clean v4.12-rc2. > > Please rebase and resend the rest of the patches.
Actually I was wrong with my assumption that there was no dependency. For the binding documentation there is dependecy accross the series I sent.
This patch depends on "pinctrl: dt-bindings: add documentation for AP806 pin controllers" [1] and "pinctrl: dt-bindings: add documentation for CP110 pin controllers" [3] from the series "Add support for the pin controllers on the Marvell Armada 7K/8K".
As you are maintainer of both gpio and pinctrl subsystem it will be easy to resolv.
But these last patches depend also on "clk: mvebu: ap806: introduce a new binding" [3] in the clock series "Improve ap806 clk support on Marvell Armada 7K/8K" and on "clk: mvebu: cp110: introduce a new binding" [4] in the clock series "Improve cp110 clk support on Marvell Armada 7K/8K".
So for these particular patches, either I rebase them on the v4.12-rc2 and there will be a small merge conflict during the merge window for v4.13, or we can ask a stable branch with only these few patches (I am adding the clock maintainer to this email).
If we chose this last option I can split the clock patches to have patch modifying only the binding documentation.
Gregory
[1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-May/507399.html [2]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-May/507398.html [3]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-May/507393.html [4]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-May/507384.html
> Would be nice with a DT ACK but no controversial changes here. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij
-- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com
| |