lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next 2/2] samples/bpf: add samples for HW_CACHE / RAW events
From
Date
On 5/22/17 4:26 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:48:40 -0700
>
>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static unsigned long long (*bpf_get_current_uid_gid)(void) =
>> (void *) BPF_FUNC_get_current_uid_gid;
>> static int (*bpf_get_current_comm)(void *buf, int buf_size) =
>> (void *) BPF_FUNC_get_current_comm;
>> -static int (*bpf_perf_event_read)(void *map, int index) =
>> +static u64 (*bpf_perf_event_read)(void *map, u64 flags) =
>> (void *) BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read;
>
> If the second argument really is "u64 flags", then please update
> the comments in tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h as well.

of course.
As independent patch, I assume.
For both tools/include/uapi/...bpf.h and include/uapi/...bpf.h

It has some info:
/* BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output and BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read flags. */
#define BPF_F_INDEX_MASK 0xffffffffULL
#define BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU BPF_F_INDEX_MASK

yet perf_event_read() is least documented. hmm.
* u64 bpf_perf_event_read(&map, index)
* Return: Number events read or error code

that needs to be fixed.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-23 01:37    [W:0.061 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site