lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: gpio-exar: Why filtering out Commtech devices?
From
Date
Hi Jan,

On 21/05/17 12:46, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Sudip,
>
> why do we carry
>
> if (pcidev->vendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_EXAR)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> in gpio_exar_probe? This effectively prevents that
>
> EXAR_DEVICE(COMMTECH, COMMTECH_4222PCIE, pbn_exar_XR17V35x),
> EXAR_DEVICE(COMMTECH, COMMTECH_4224PCIE, pbn_exar_XR17V35x),
> EXAR_DEVICE(COMMTECH, COMMTECH_4228PCIE, pbn_exar_XR17V35x),
>
> gain GPIO support. Do those devices lack access to the pins? Or can we
> drop the filter. I don't have access to those devices, just wondering
> because the code is not explaining the reason.

Same here. I do not have these devices and have no idea if they support
the gpio pins or not.

Adding Matt Schulte in the Cc list, maybe he can comment.


--
Regards
Sudip

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-21 22:10    [W:0.078 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site