Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 12 May 2017 09:43:22 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? |
| |
On Fri, 12 May 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Fixes: BKrev: 3e8e57a1JvR25MkFRNzoz85l2Gzccg ("[PATCH] linux-2.5.66-signal-cleanup.patch") > > In your tree that is c3c107051660 ("[PATCH] linux-2.5.66-signal-cleanup.patch"), > but you don't have the 3e8e57a1JvR25MkFRNzoz85l2Gzccg revision recorded > anywhere that I can see.
That's correct. I did not include the BK revisions when I imported the commits into the history git. I did not see any reason to do so. I still have no idea what the value would have been or why anyone wants to reference them at all.
Thanks,
tglx
| |