lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] GPU-DRM-Radeon: Fine-tuning for three function implementations
From
Date
On 10/05/17 08:30 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 10.05.2017 um 02:23 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 03/05/17 09:46 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 02.05.2017 um 22:04 schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
>>>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>>>> Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 22:00:02 +0200
>>>>
>>>> Three update suggestions were taken into account
>>>> from static source code analysis.
>>>>
>>>> Markus Elfring (3):
>>>> Use seq_putc() in radeon_sa_bo_dump_debug_info()
>>>> Use seq_puts() in radeon_debugfs_pm_info()
>>>> Use seq_puts() in r100_debugfs_cp_csq_fifo()
>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>> Based on
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2017-May/140837.html
>> and followups, I'm afraid we'll have to make sure Markus' patches have
>> been tested adequately before applying them.
>
> I can't judge the background of that decision, but at least those tree
> patches for radeon looked trivial to me.

Which is part of the issue, see also
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2017-May/140694.html
and other posts in that thread.


--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-11 04:41    [W:0.042 / U:22.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site