lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: fix spelling mistake: "allocationf" -> "allocation"


On Wed, 10 May 2017, Colin King wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in dev_err message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c
> index 21cac1c8dd4c..e74119113713 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c
> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static int sst_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
> snd_dma_continuous_data(GFP_DMA),
> SST_MIN_BUFFER, SST_MAX_BUFFER);
> if (retval) {
> - dev_err(rtd->dev, "dma buffer allocationf fail\n");
> + dev_err(rtd->dev, "dma buffer allocation fail\n");

Maybe fail -> failure would be nice too? If the message is useful at all.

julia

> return retval;
> }
> }
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-10 21:21    [W:0.024 / U:26.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site