lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 4/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi file for RK3328 SoCs


On 04/05/2017 12:04 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Montag, 27. März 2017, 17:40:48 CEST schrieb cl@rock-chips.com:
>> From: Liang Chen <cl@rock-chips.com>
>>
>> This patch adds core dtsi file for Rockchip RK3328 SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <cl@rock-chips.com>
>
> applied for 4.12, with the following list of changes:
>
> - reorder some properties to bring them in alphabetical order
> - dropped the status-disabled from the power-controller
> power-domain control is a quite essential part of the system, so if
> boards really want to disable them, they should do it in their board file
> Having power-domains on all the time, is also our default in all other
> devicetrees.
> - removed #dma-cells from spi0 -> this is not a dma controller
> - reword the cru assigned-clocks comment a bit
> - fixed sdmmc1_bus4 pins, as indicated by Shawn and after looking up the
> correct pins in the manual
>
>
> And a final question, are you sure about SCLK_PDM becoming a child of the
> APLL in your cru assigned-clocks, as the APLL will vary later on with cpufreq
> active?
>
the NPLL will vary later on with cpufreq active.

The NPLL is better than APLL, so NPLL is for clk_core,and apll is for pdm.

please see the TRM in CRU:
1.4 Function Description
/........./
To maximize the flexibility, some of clocks can select divider source
from 5 PLLs. (Note: It’s
recommended to use NEW PLL instead of ARM PLL as arm clock source,
because NEW PLL is
near to ARM. And it’s jitter is better than ARM PLL).

>
> Heiko
>
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-05 04:13    [W:0.058 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site