Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26 (net/can/bcm.c) | From | Oliver Hartkopp <> | Date | Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:18:33 +0200 |
| |
Hi Randy,
thanks for the report!
Some fallout of my namespace support integration %-)
I posted a patch for it:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=149323049630039&w=2
Many thanks & best regards, Oliver
On 04/26/2017 04:53 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/26/17 01:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20170424: >> > > on x86_64: > > when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled: > > ../net/can/bcm.c:1541:14: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir' > ../net/can/bcm.c:1601:14: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir' > ../net/can/bcm.c:1696:11: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir' > ../net/can/bcm.c:1707:15: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named 'bcmproc_dir' > > 2 of those are "protected" by > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_FS)) { > but that doesn't seem to help/work here. > > gcc v4.8.5 > > >
| |