lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] libnvdimm, region: sysfs trigger for nvdimm_flush()
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Masayoshi Mizuma
<m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:48:57 -0700 Dan Williams wrote:
>> The nvdimm_flush() mechanism helps to reduce the impact of an ADR
>> (asynchronous-dimm-refresh) failure. The ADR mechanism handles flushing
>> platform WPQ (write-pending-queue) buffers when power is removed. The
>> nvdimm_flush() mechanism performs that same function on-demand.
>>
>> When a pmem namespace is associated with a block device, an
>> nvdimm_flush() is triggered with every block-layer REQ_FUA, or REQ_FLUSH
>> request. However, when a namespace is in device-dax mode, or namespaces
>> are disabled, userspace needs another path.
>>
>> The new 'flush' attribute is visible when it can be determined that the
>> interleave-set either does, or does not have DIMMs that expose WPQ-flush
>> addresses, "flush-hints" in ACPI NFIT terminology. It returns "1" and
>> flushes DIMMs, or returns "0" the flush operation is a platform nop.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
>> index 8de5a04644a1..3495b4c23941 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
>> @@ -255,6 +255,19 @@ static ssize_t size_show(struct device *dev,
>> }
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(size);
>>
>> +static ssize_t flush_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct nd_region *nd_region = to_nd_region(dev);
>> +
>> + if (nvdimm_has_flush(nd_region)) {
>
> nvdimm_has_flush() also returns as -ENXIO, so
>
> if (nvdimm_has_flush(nd_region) == 1)

If it returns -ENXIO then region_visible() will hide the attribute.

>
>> + nvdimm_flush(nd_region);
>> + return sprintf(buf, "1\n");
>> + }
>> + return sprintf(buf, "0\n");
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(flush);
>> +
>
> I think separating show and store is better because
> users may only check wheter the device has the flush capability or not.

Makes sense, I'll separate. Thanks for the review.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-24 09:05    [W:0.261 / U:0.908 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site