lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of: introduce event tracepoints for dynamic device_node lifecyle
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:42:32 -0700
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:

> And of course the other issue with using tracepoints is the extra space
> required to hold the tracepoint info. With the pr_debug() approach, the
> space usage can be easily removed for a production kernel via a config
> option.

Now if you are saying you want to be able to enable debugging without
the tracing infrastructure I would agree. As the tracing infrastructure
is large. But I'm working on shrinking it more.

>
> Tracepoints are wonderful technology, but not always the proper tool to
> use for debug info.

But if you are going to have tracing enabled regardless, adding a few
more tracepoints isn't going to make the difference.

-- Steve

>
> > If Rob wants to convert printk() style data to trace data (and I can't
> > convince him otherwise) then I will have further comments on this specific
> > patch.
> >

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-19 04:50    [W:0.192 / U:9.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site