lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 6/8] coresight: add support for CPU debug module
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:40:50AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:30:59PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Coresight includes debug module and usually the module connects with CPU
> > debug logic. ARMv8 architecture reference manual (ARM DDI 0487A.k) has
> > description for related info in "Part H: External Debug".
> >
> > Chapter H7 "The Sample-based Profiling Extension" introduces several
> > sampling registers, e.g. we can check program counter value with
> > combined CPU exception level, secure state, etc. So this is helpful for
> > analysis CPU lockup scenarios, e.g. if one CPU has run into infinite
> > loop with IRQ disabled. In this case the CPU cannot switch context and
> > handle any interrupt (including IPIs), as the result it cannot handle
> > SMP call for stack dump.
> >
> > This patch is to enable coresight debug module, so firstly this driver
> > is to bind apb clock for debug module and this is to ensure the debug
> > module can be accessed from program or external debugger. And the driver
> > uses sample-based registers for debug purpose, e.g. when system triggers
> > panic, the driver will dump program counter and combined context
> > registers (EDCIDSR, EDVIDSR); by parsing context registers so can
> > quickly get to know CPU secure state, exception level, etc.
> >
> > Some of the debug module registers are located in CPU power domain, so
> > this requires the CPU power domain stays on when access related debug
> > registers, but the power management for CPU power domain is quite
> > dependent on SoC integration for power management. For the platforms
> > which with sane power controller implementations, this driver follows
> > the method to set EDPRCR to try to pull the CPU out of low power state
> > and then set 'no power down request' bit so the CPU has no chance to
> > lose power.
> >
> > If the SoC has not followed up this design well for power management
> > controller, the user should use the command line parameter or sysfs
> > to constrain all or partial idle states to ensure the CPU power
> > domain is enabled and access coresight CPU debug component safely.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
>
> This is coming along well - a few comment below. In your next revision please
> add GKH to the 'To' list.

Sure. Will send out in this week and add Greg in 'To' list.

> > ---
> > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig | 14 +
> > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c | 667 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 682 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
> > index 130cb21..8d55d6d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
> > @@ -89,4 +89,18 @@ config CORESIGHT_STM
> > logging useful software events or data coming from various entities
> > in the system, possibly running different OSs
> >
> > +config CORESIGHT_CPU_DEBUG
> > + tristate "CoreSight CPU Debug driver"
> > + depends on ARM || ARM64
> > + depends on DEBUG_FS
> > + help
> > + This driver provides support for coresight debugging module. This
> > + is primarily used to dump sample-based profiling registers when
> > + system triggers panic, the driver will parse context registers so
> > + can quickly get to know program counter (PC), secure state,
> > + exception level, etc. Before use debugging functionality, platform
> > + needs to ensure the clock domain and power domain are enabled
> > + properly, please refer Documentation/trace/coresight-cpu-debug.txt
> > + for detailed description and the example for usage.
> > +
> > endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
> > index af480d9..433d590 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
> > @@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM4X) += coresight-etm4x.o \
> > coresight-etm4x-sysfs.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_QCOM_REPLICATOR) += coresight-replicator-qcom.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_STM) += coresight-stm.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_CPU_DEBUG) += coresight-cpu-debug.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..8470e31
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,667 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2017 Linaro Limited. All rights reserved.
> > + *
> > + * Author: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published by
> > + * the Free Software Foundation.
> > + *
> > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> > + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
> > + * more details.
> > + *
> > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
> > + * this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/amba/bus.h>
> > +#include <linux/coresight.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> > +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/smp.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > +
> > +#include "coresight-priv.h"
> > +
> > +#define EDPCSR 0x0A0
> > +#define EDCIDSR 0x0A4
> > +#define EDVIDSR 0x0A8
> > +#define EDPCSR_HI 0x0AC
> > +#define EDOSLAR 0x300
> > +#define EDPRCR 0x310
> > +#define EDPRSR 0x314
> > +#define EDDEVID1 0xFC4
> > +#define EDDEVID 0xFC8
> > +
> > +#define EDPCSR_PROHIBITED 0xFFFFFFFF
> > +
> > +/* bits definition for EDPCSR */
> > +#define EDPCSR_THUMB BIT(0)
> > +#define EDPCSR_ARM_INST_MASK GENMASK(31, 2)
> > +#define EDPCSR_THUMB_INST_MASK GENMASK(31, 1)
> > +
> > +/* bits definition for EDPRCR */
> > +#define EDPRCR_COREPURQ BIT(3)
> > +#define EDPRCR_CORENPDRQ BIT(0)
> > +
> > +/* bits definition for EDPRSR */
> > +#define EDPRSR_DLK BIT(6)
> > +#define EDPRSR_PU BIT(0)
> > +
> > +/* bits definition for EDVIDSR */
> > +#define EDVIDSR_NS BIT(31)
> > +#define EDVIDSR_E2 BIT(30)
> > +#define EDVIDSR_E3 BIT(29)
> > +#define EDVIDSR_HV BIT(28)
> > +#define EDVIDSR_VMID GENMASK(7, 0)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * bits definition for EDDEVID1:PSCROffset
> > + *
> > + * NOTE: armv8 and armv7 have different definition for the register,
> > + * so consolidate the bits definition as below:
> > + *
> > + * 0b0000 - Sample offset applies based on the instruction state, we
> > + * rely on EDDEVID to check if EDPCSR is implemented or not
> > + * 0b0001 - No offset applies.
> > + * 0b0010 - No offset applies, but do not use in AArch32 mode
> > + *
> > + */
> > +#define EDDEVID1_PCSR_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
> > +#define EDDEVID1_PCSR_OFFSET_INS_SET (0x0)
> > +#define EDDEVID1_PCSR_NO_OFFSET_DIS_AARCH32 (0x2)
> > +
> > +/* bits definition for EDDEVID */
> > +#define EDDEVID_PCSAMPLE_MODE GENMASK(3, 0)
> > +#define EDDEVID_IMPL_EDPCSR (0x1)
> > +#define EDDEVID_IMPL_EDPCSR_EDCIDSR (0x2)
> > +#define EDDEVID_IMPL_FULL (0x3)
> > +
> > +#define DEBUG_WAIT_SLEEP 1000
> > +#define DEBUG_WAIT_TIMEOUT 32000
> > +
> > +struct debug_drvdata {
> > + void __iomem *base;
> > e struct device *dev;
> > + int cpu;
> > +
> > + bool edpcsr_present;
> > + bool edcidsr_present;
> > + bool edvidsr_present;
> > + bool pc_has_offset;
> > +
> > + u32 edpcsr;
> > + u32 edpcsr_hi;
> > + u32 edprsr;
> > + u32 edvidsr;
> > + u32 edcidsr;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(debug_lock);
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct debug_drvdata *, debug_drvdata);
> > +static int debug_count;
> > +static struct dentry *debug_debugfs_dir;
> > +
> > +static bool debug_enable;
> > +module_param_named(enable, debug_enable, bool, 0600);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Knob to enable debug functionality "
> > + "(default is 0, which means is disabled by default)");
>
> For this driver we have a debugFS interface so I question the validity of a
> kernel module parameter. Other than adding complexity to the code it offers no
> real added value. If a user is to insmod a module, it is just as easy to switch
> on the functionality using debugFS in a second step.

This module parameter can be used for kernel command line, so
it's useful when user wants to dynamically turn on/off the
functionality at boot up time.

Does this make sense for you? Removing this parameter is okay for
me, but this means users need to decide if use it by Kernel config
with static building in. This is a bit contradictory with before's
discussion.

> > +static void debug_os_unlock(struct debug_drvdata *drvdata)
> > +{
> > + /* Unlocks the debug registers */
> > + writel_relaxed(0x0, drvdata->base + EDOSLAR);
>
> Here the wmb is to make sure reordering (either at compile time or in the CPU)
> doesn't happend. You need a comment here otherwise checkpatch will complain.
> Speaking of which, did you run this through checkpatch?

Right. Everytime I run checkpatch before sending patch and it has
complain for this. Will add comment. Sorry for imprecise working.

> > + wmb();
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * According to ARM DDI 0487A.k, before access external debug
> > + * registers should firstly check the access permission; if any
> > + * below condition has been met then cannot access debug
> > + * registers to avoid lockup issue:
> > + *
> > + * - CPU power domain is powered off;
> > + * - The OS Double Lock is locked;
> > + *
> > + * By checking EDPRSR can get to know if meet these conditions.
> > + */
> > +static bool debug_access_permitted(struct debug_drvdata *drvdata)
> > +{
> > + /* CPU is powered off */
> > + if (!(drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_PU))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + /* The OS Double Lock is locked */
> > + if (drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_DLK)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void debug_force_cpu_powered_up(struct debug_drvdata *drvdata)
> > +{
> > + bool retried = false;
> > + u32 edprcr;
> > +
> > +try_again:
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Send request to power management controller and assert
> > + * DBGPWRUPREQ signal; if power management controller has
> > + * sane implementation, it should enable CPU power domain
> > + * in case CPU is in low power state.
> > + */
> > + edprcr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDPRCR);
> > + edprcr |= EDPRCR_COREPURQ;
> > + writel_relaxed(edprcr, drvdata->base + EDPRCR);
> > +
> > + /* Wait for CPU to be powered up (timeout~=32ms) */
> > + if (readx_poll_timeout_atomic(readl_relaxed, drvdata->base + EDPRSR,
> > + drvdata->edprsr, (drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_PU),
> > + DEBUG_WAIT_SLEEP, DEBUG_WAIT_TIMEOUT)) {
> > + /*
> > + * Unfortunately the CPU cannot be powered up, so return
> > + * back and later has no permission to access other
> > + * registers. For this case, should disable CPU low power
> > + * states to ensure CPU power domain is enabled!
> > + */
> > + pr_err("%s: power up request for CPU%d failed\n",
> > + __func__, drvdata->cpu);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * At this point the CPU is powered up, so set the no powerdown
> > + * request bit so we don't lose power and emulate power down.
> > + */
> > + edprcr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDPRCR);
> > + edprcr |= EDPRCR_COREPURQ | EDPRCR_CORENPDRQ;
> > + writel_relaxed(edprcr, drvdata->base + EDPRCR);
> > +
> > + drvdata->edprsr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDPRSR);
> > +
> > + /* Bail out if CPU is powered up */
> > + if (likely(drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_PU))
> > + return;
>
> /* The core power domain got switched off on use, try again */
> if (unlikely(!drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_PU))
> goto try_again;
>
> I understand you don't want to introduce a infinite loop but if that happens
> here, something else has gone very wrong. The above readx_poll_timeout_atomic
> loop should take care of bailing out in case of problems. That way you also get
> to rid of the retried variable and the code is more simple.

Okay. I will follow your method. Thinking the duration of CPU power
on/off is not same magnitude with this piece code, the infinite loop
will not happen.

> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Handle race condition if CPU has been waken up but it sleeps
> > + * again if EDPRCR_CORENPDRQ has been flipped, so try to run
> > + * waken flow one more time.
> > + */
> > + if (!retried) {
> > + retried = true;
> > + goto try_again;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void debug_read_regs(struct debug_drvdata *drvdata)
> > +{
> > + u32 save_edprcr;
> > +
> > + CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
> > +
> > + /* Unlock os lock */
> > + debug_os_unlock(drvdata);
> > +
> > + /* Save EDPRCR register */
> > + save_edprcr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDPRCR);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Ensure CPU power domain is enabled to let registers
> > + * are accessiable.
> > + */
> > + debug_force_cpu_powered_up(drvdata);
> > +
> > + if (!debug_access_permitted(drvdata))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + drvdata->edpcsr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDPCSR);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * As described in ARM DDI 0487A.k, if the processing
> > + * element (PE) is in debug state, or sample-based
> > + * profiling is prohibited, EDPCSR reads as 0xFFFFFFFF;
> > + * EDCIDSR, EDVIDSR and EDPCSR_HI registers also become
> > + * UNKNOWN state. So directly bail out for this case.
> > + */
> > + if (drvdata->edpcsr == EDPCSR_PROHIBITED)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * A read of the EDPCSR normally has the side-effect of
> > + * indirectly writing to EDCIDSR, EDVIDSR and EDPCSR_HI;
> > + * at this point it's safe to read value from them.
> > + */
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
> > + drvdata->edpcsr_hi = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDPCSR_HI);
> > +
> > + if (drvdata->edcidsr_present)
> > + drvdata->edcidsr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDCIDSR);
> > +
> > + if (drvdata->edvidsr_present)
> > + drvdata->edvidsr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDVIDSR);
> > +
> > +out:
> > + /* Restore EDPRCR register */
> > + writel_relaxed(save_edprcr, drvdata->base + EDPRCR);
> > +
> > + CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static unsigned long debug_adjust_pc(struct debug_drvdata *drvdata)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long arm_inst_offset = 0, thumb_inst_offset = 0;
> > + unsigned long pc;
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
> > + return (unsigned long)drvdata->edpcsr_hi << 32 |
> > + (unsigned long)drvdata->edpcsr;
> > +
> > + pc = (unsigned long)drvdata->edpcsr;
> > +
> > + if (drvdata->pc_has_offset) {
> > + arm_inst_offset = 8;
> > + thumb_inst_offset = 4;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Handle thumb instruction */
> > + if (pc & EDPCSR_THUMB) {
> > + pc = (pc & EDPCSR_THUMB_INST_MASK) - thumb_inst_offset;
> > + return pc;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Handle arm instruction offset, if the arm instruction
> > + * is not 4 byte alignment then it's possible the case
> > + * for implementation defined; keep original value for this
> > + * case and print info for notice.
> > + */
> > + if (pc & BIT(1))
> > + pr_emerg("Instruction offset is implementation defined\n");
> > + else
> > + pc = (pc & EDPCSR_ARM_INST_MASK) - arm_inst_offset;
> > +
> > + return pc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void debug_dump_regs(struct debug_drvdata *drvdata)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long pc;
> > +
> > + pr_emerg("\tEDPRSR: %08x (Power:%s DLK:%s)\n", drvdata->edprsr,
> > + drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_PU ? "On" : "Off",
> > + drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_DLK ? "Lock" : "Unlock");
> > +
> > + if (!debug_access_permitted(drvdata)) {
> > + pr_emerg("No permission to access debug registers!\n");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (drvdata->edpcsr == EDPCSR_PROHIBITED) {
> > + pr_emerg("CPU is in Debug state or profiling is prohibited!\n");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pc = debug_adjust_pc(drvdata);
> > + pr_emerg("\tEDPCSR: [<%p>] %pS\n", (void *)pc, (void *)pc);
> > +
> > + if (drvdata->edcidsr_present)
> > + pr_emerg("\tEDCIDSR: %08x\n", drvdata->edcidsr);
> > +
> > + if (drvdata->edvidsr_present)
> > + pr_emerg("\tEDVIDSR: %08x (State:%s Mode:%s Width:%dbits VMID:%x)\n",
> > + drvdata->edvidsr,
> > + drvdata->edvidsr & EDVIDSR_NS ? "Non-secure" : "Secure",
> > + drvdata->edvidsr & EDVIDSR_E3 ? "EL3" :
> > + (drvdata->edvidsr & EDVIDSR_E2 ? "EL2" : "EL1/0"),
> > + drvdata->edvidsr & EDVIDSR_HV ? 64 : 32,
> > + drvdata->edvidsr & (u32)EDVIDSR_VMID);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void debug_init_arch_data(void *info)
> > +{
> > + struct debug_drvdata *drvdata = info;
> > + u32 mode, pcsr_offset;
> > + u32 eddevid, eddevid1;
> > +
> > + CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
> > +
> > + /* Read device info */
> > + eddevid = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDDEVID);
> > + eddevid1 = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDDEVID1);
> > +
> > + CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
> > +
> > + /* Parse implementation feature */
> > + mode = eddevid & EDDEVID_PCSAMPLE_MODE;
> > + pcsr_offset = eddevid1 & EDDEVID1_PCSR_OFFSET_MASK;
> > +
> > + drvdata->edpcsr_present = false;
> > + drvdata->edcidsr_present = false;
> > + drvdata->edvidsr_present = false;
> > + drvdata->pc_has_offset = false;
> > +
> > + switch (mode) {
> > + case EDDEVID_IMPL_FULL:
> > + drvdata->edvidsr_present = true;
> > + /* Fall through */
> > + case EDDEVID_IMPL_EDPCSR_EDCIDSR:
> > + drvdata->edcidsr_present = true;
> > + /* Fall through */
> > + case EDDEVID_IMPL_EDPCSR:
> > + /*
> > + * In ARM DDI 0487A.k, the EDDEVID1.PCSROffset is used to
> > + * define if has the offset for PC sampling value; if read
> > + * back EDDEVID1.PCSROffset == 0x2, then this means the debug
> > + * module does not sample the instruction set state when
> > + * armv8 CPU in AArch32 state.
> > + */
> > + drvdata->edpcsr_present = (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) ||
> > + (pcsr_offset != EDDEVID1_PCSR_NO_OFFSET_DIS_AARCH32));
> > +
> > + drvdata->pc_has_offset =
> > + (pcsr_offset == EDDEVID1_PCSR_OFFSET_INS_SET);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Dump out information on panic.
> > + */
> > +static int debug_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *self,
> > + unsigned long v, void *p)
> > +{
> > + int cpu;
> > + struct debug_drvdata *drvdata;
> > +
> > + pr_emerg("ARM external debug module:\n");
> > +
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > + drvdata = per_cpu(debug_drvdata, cpu);
> > + if (!drvdata)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + pr_emerg("CPU[%d]:\n", drvdata->cpu);
> > +
> > + debug_read_regs(drvdata);
> > + debug_dump_regs(drvdata);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct notifier_block debug_notifier = {
> > + .notifier_call = debug_notifier_call,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int debug_enable_func(void)
> > +{
> > + struct debug_drvdata *drvdata;
> > + int cpu;
> > +
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > + drvdata = per_cpu(debug_drvdata, cpu);
> > + if (!drvdata)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + pm_runtime_get_sync(drvdata->dev);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return atomic_notifier_chain_register(&panic_notifier_list,
> > + &debug_notifier);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int debug_disable_func(void)
> > +{
> > + struct debug_drvdata *drvdata;
> > + int cpu;
> > +
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > + drvdata = per_cpu(debug_drvdata, cpu);
> > + if (!drvdata)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + pm_runtime_put(drvdata->dev);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&panic_notifier_list,
> > + &debug_notifier);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t debug_func_knob_write(struct file *f,
> > + const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > + u8 val;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = kstrtou8_from_user(buf, count, 2, &val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&debug_lock);
> > +
> > + if (val == debug_enable)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + if (val)
> > + ret = debug_enable_func();
> > + else
> > + ret = debug_disable_func();
>
> I don't think you need to install the handler every time the functionality is
> switched on/off. I suggest to install the handler at boot time (or module
> insertion time) and in the notifier handler, check the debug_enable flag before
> moving on with the output.

Will do.

> > +
> > + if (ret) {
> > + pr_err("%s: unable to %s debug function: %d\n",
> > + __func__, val ? "enable" : "disable", ret);
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + debug_enable = val;
>
> Using a true/false value is probably better here. That way you don't end up
> with miscellaneous values in debugFS.

From my testing here will not assign other values rather than 0 or 1.
This is controlled by function kstrtou8_from_user(), the 3rd parameter
'2' is to define the value range [0..1], so other values will report
error after return back from kstrtou8_from_user().

> > +out:
> > + ret = count;
> > +err:
> > + mutex_unlock(&debug_lock);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t debug_func_knob_read(struct file *f,
> > + char __user *ubuf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > + ssize_t ret;
> > + char buf[2];
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&debug_lock);
> > +
> > + buf[0] = '0' + debug_enable;
> > + buf[1] = '\n';
>
> snprintf()

Will fix.

> > + ret = simple_read_from_buffer(ubuf, count, ppos, buf, sizeof(buf));
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&debug_lock);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct file_operations debug_func_knob_fops = {
> > + .open = simple_open,
> > + .read = debug_func_knob_read,
> > + .write = debug_func_knob_write,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int debug_func_init(void)
> > +{
> > + struct dentry *file;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* Create debugfs node */
> > + debug_debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("coresight_cpu_debug", NULL);
> > + if (!debug_debugfs_dir) {
> > + pr_err("%s: unable to create debugfs directory\n", __func__);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + file = debugfs_create_file("enable", S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> > + debug_debugfs_dir, NULL, &debug_func_knob_fops);
>
> Please align this properly.

Will fix. Thanks a lot for detailed reviewing.

[...]

Thanks,
Leo Yan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-19 02:18    [W:0.621 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site