lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/6] powerpc/perf: Define big-endian version of perf_mem_data_src
From
Date


On Thursday 13 April 2017 06:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 07:21:05AM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> perf_mem_data_src is an union that is initialized via the ->val field
>> and accessed via the bitmap fields. For this to work on big endian
>> platforms (Which is broken now), we also need a big-endian represenation
>> of perf_mem_data_src. i.e, in a big endian system, if user request
>> PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC (perf report -d), will get the default value from
>> perf_sample_data_init(), which is PERF_MEM_NA. Value for PERF_MEM_NA
>> is constructed using shifts:
>>
>> /* TLB access */
>> #define PERF_MEM_TLB_NA 0x01 /* not available */
>> ...
>> #define PERF_MEM_TLB_SHIFT 26
>>
>> #define PERF_MEM_S(a, s) \
>> (((__u64)PERF_MEM_##a##_##s) << PERF_MEM_##a##_SHIFT)
>>
>> #define PERF_MEM_NA (PERF_MEM_S(OP, NA) |\
>> PERF_MEM_S(LVL, NA) |\
>> PERF_MEM_S(SNOOP, NA) |\
>> PERF_MEM_S(LOCK, NA) |\
>> PERF_MEM_S(TLB, NA))
>>
>> Which works out as:
>>
>> ((0x01 << 0) | (0x01 << 5) | (0x01 << 19) | (0x01 << 24) | (0x01 << 26))
>>
>> Which means the PERF_MEM_NA value comes out of the kernel as 0x5080021
>> in CPU endian.
>>
>> But then in the perf tool, the code uses the bitfields to inspect the
>> value, and currently the bitfields are defined using little endian
>> ordering.
>>
>> So eg. in perf_mem__tlb_scnprintf() we see:
>> data_src->val = 0x5080021
>> op = 0x0
>> lvl = 0x0
>> snoop = 0x0
>> lock = 0x0
>> dtlb = 0x0
>> rsvd = 0x5080021
>>
>> Patch does a minimal fix of adding big endian definition of the bitfields
>> to match the values that are already exported by the kernel on big endian.
>> And it makes no change on little endian.
> I think it is important to note that there are no current big-endian
> users. So 'fixing' this will not break anybody and will ensure future
> users (next patch) will work correctly.
>
> Aside from that amendment,
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

Thanks
Maddy


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-17 05:47    [W:0.811 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site