lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: There is a Tasks RCU stall warning
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:18:17 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:


> > Well the trampolines pretty much can, but they are removed before
> > calling synchronize_rcu_tasks(), and nothing can enter the trampoline
> > when that is called.
>
> Color me confused...
>
> So you can have an arbitrary function call within a trampoline?

Sorta.

When you do register_ftrace_function(ops), where ops has ops->func that
points to a function you want to have called when a function is traced,
the following happens (if there's no other ops registered). Let's use
an example where ops is filtered on just the schedule() function call:


<schedule>:
call trampoline ---+
[..] |
+--> <trampoline>:
push regs
call ops->func
pop regs
ret

But that ops->func() must be very limited in what it can do. Although,
it may actually call an rcu_read_lock()! But if that's the case, it
must either check if rcu is watching (which perf does), or enable rcu
via the rcu_irq_enter() with a check on rcu_irq_enter_disabled(), which
my stack tracer does.

Now this can be called even from NMI context! Thus what ops->func does
must be aware of that. The stack tracer func has an:

if (in_nmi())
return;

Because it needs to grab spin locks.

But one thing an op->func() is never allowed to do, is to call
schedule() directly, or even a cond_resched(). It may be preempted if
preemption was enabled when the trampoline was hit, but it must not
assume that it can do a voluntary schedule. That would break the
rcu_tasks as well if it did.


>
> If not, agreed, no problem. Otherwise, it seems like we have a big
> problem remaining. Unless the functions called from a trampoline are
> guaranteed never to do a context switch.

Well, they can be preempted, but they should never do a voluntary
schedule. If they did, that would be bad.

>
> So what exactly is the trampoline code allowed to do? ;-)

Well, it must be able to work in an NMI context, or bail otherwise. And
it should never schedule on its own.

>
> My problem is that I have no idea what can and cannot be included in
> trampoline code. In absence of that information, my RCU-honed reflexes
> jump immediately to the worst case that I can think of. ;-)
>

Lets just say that it can't voluntarily sleep. Would that be good
enough? If someday in the future I decide to let it do so, I would add
a flag and force that ops not to be able to use a dynamic trampoline.

Currently, without the synchronize_rcu_tasks(), when a dynamic ops is
registered, the functions will point to a non dynamic trampoline. That
is, one that is never freed. It simply does:

preempt_disable_notrace();

do_for_each_ftrace_op(op, ftrace_ops_list) {
/*
* Check the following for each ops before calling their func:
* if RCU flag is set, then rcu_is_watching() must be true
* if PER_CPU is set, then ftrace_function_local_disable()
* must be false
* Otherwise test if the ip matches the ops filter
*
* If any of the above fails then the op->func() is not executed.
*/
if ((!(op->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_RCU) || rcu_is_watching()) &&
(!(op->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_PER_CPU) ||
!ftrace_function_local_disabled(op)) &&
ftrace_ops_test(op, ip, regs)) {

if (FTRACE_WARN_ON(!op->func)) {
pr_warn("op=%p %pS\n", op, op);
goto out;
}
op->func(ip, parent_ip, op, regs);
}
} while_for_each_ftrace_op(op);
out:
preempt_enable_notrace();

-- Steve

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-12 17:54    [W:0.086 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site