[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function
2017-04-12 15:58 GMT+02:00 Stephen Smalley <>:
> Even your usage of selinux_is_enabled() looks suspect; that should
> probably go away. Only other user of it seems to be some cred validity
> checking that could be dropped as well.

Well the main reason for calling selinux_is_enabled() is performance
Should I propose a patch to add a new security_is_enabled() function
at the LSM abstraction layer? Or do you consider we should not test
security enabled at all?

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-12 17:20    [W:0.054 / U:1.004 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site