lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC 2/6] mm, mempolicy: stop adjusting current->il_next in mpol_rebind_nodemask()
From
Date
On 11.4.2017 19:32, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
>> The task->il_next variable remembers the last allocation node for task's
>> MPOL_INTERLEAVE policy. mpol_rebind_nodemask() updates interleave and
>> bind mempolicies due to changing cpuset mems. Currently it also tries to
>> make sure that current->il_next is valid within the updated nodemask. This is
>> bogus, because 1) we are updating potentially any task's mempolicy, not just
>> current, and 2) we might be updating per-vma mempolicy, not task one.
>>
>> The interleave_nodes() function that uses il_next can cope fine with the value
>> not being within the currently allowed nodes, so this hasn't manifested as an
>> actual issue. Thus it also won't be an issue if we just remove this adjustment
>> completely.
>
> Well, interleave_nodes() will then potentially return a node outside of
> the allowed memory policy when its called for the first time after
> mpol_rebind_.. . But thenn it will find the next node within the
> nodemask and work correctly for the next invocations.

Hmm, you're right. But that could be easily fixed if il_next became il_prev, so
we would return the result of next_node_in(il_prev) and also store it as the new
il_prev, right? I somehow assumed it already worked that way.

> But yea the race can probably be ignored. The idea was that the
> application has a stable memory footprint during rebinding.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-11 21:04    [W:0.059 / U:1.552 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site