lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (btrfs)
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 06:05:02PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:10:48AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 04/07/17 08:08, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 04/07/17 01:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Changes since 20170406:
> > >>
> > >
> > > on i386:
> > >
> > > ERROR: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined!
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> > >
> >
> > or when built-in:
> >
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `scrub_bio_end_io_worker':
> > scrub.c:(.text+0x3d1908): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `scrub_raid56_parity':
> > scrub.c:(.text+0x3d23cc): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> > scrub.c:(.text+0x3d3342): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> > scrub.c:(.text+0x3d3755): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
>
> Sorry, I can't reproduce it here, I've also tried my other for-next
> snapshot branches, same. We have some recent patches that could trigger
> the __udivdi3 build check,
>
> "Btrfs: update scrub_parity to use u64 stripe_len" (7d0ef8b4dbbd22)
>
> manual check or with help of coccinell didn't show me any instances of
> 64bit division with / .

Fixed and updated for-next pushed to my k.org repository.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-10 13:50    [W:0.070 / U:9.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site