lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm, numa: Fix bad pmd by atomically check for pmd_trans_huge when marking page tables prot_numa
Date
On 10 Apr 2017, at 17:09, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 19:07:14 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:49:40PM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
>>> On 10 Apr 2017, at 12:20, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:45:08AM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
>>>>>> While this could be fixed with heavy locking, it's only necessary to
>>>>>> make a copy of the PMD on the stack during change_pmd_range and avoid
>>>>>> races. A new helper is created for this as the check if quite subtle and the
>>>>>> existing similar helpful is not suitable. This passed 154 hours of testing
>>>>>> (usually triggers between 20 minutes and 24 hours) without detecting bad
>>>>>> PMDs or corruption. A basic test of an autonuma-intensive workload showed
>>>>>> no significant change in behaviour.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
>>>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this patch fix the same problem fixed by Kirill's patch here?
>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/2/347
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't think so. The race I'm concerned with is due to locks not being
>>>> held and is in a different path.
>>>
>>> I do not agree. Kirill's patch is fixing the same race problem but in
>>> zap_pmd_range().
>>>
>>> The original autoNUMA code first clears PMD then sets it to protnone entry.
>>> pmd_trans_huge() does not return TRUE because it saw cleared PMD, but
>>> pmd_none_or_clear_bad() later saw the protnone entry and reported it as bad.
>>> Is this the problem you are trying solve?
>>>
>>> Kirill's patch will pmdp_invalidate() the PMD entry, which keeps _PAGE_PSE bit,
>>> so pmd_trans_huge() will return TRUE. In this case, it also fixes
>>> your race problem in change_pmd_range().
>>>
>>> Let me know if I miss anything.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, now I see. I think you're correct and I withdraw the patch.
>
> I have Kirrill's
>
> thp-reduce-indentation-level-in-change_huge_pmd.patch
> thp-fix-madv_dontneed-vs-numa-balancing-race.patch
> mm-drop-unused-pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_notify.patch
> thp-fix-madv_dontneed-vs-madv_free-race.patch
> thp-fix-madv_dontneed-vs-madv_free-race-fix.patch
> thp-fix-madv_dontneed-vs-clear-soft-dirty-race.patch
>
> scheduled for 4.12-rc1. It sounds like
> thp-fix-madv_dontneed-vs-madv_free-race.patch and
> thp-fix-madv_dontneed-vs-madv_free-race.patch need to be boosted to
> 4.11 and stable?

thp-fix-madv_dontneed-vs-numa-balancing-race.patch is the fix for
numa balancing problem reported in this thread.

mm-drop-unused-pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_notify.patch,
thp-fix-madv_dontneed-vs-madv_free-race.patch,
thp-fix-madv_dontneed-vs-madv_free-race-fix.patch, and
thp-fix-madv_dontneed-vs-clear-soft-dirty-race.patch

are the fixes for other potential race problems similar to this one.

I think it is better to have all these patches applied.

--
Best Regards
Yan Zi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-11 00:29    [W:0.103 / U:32.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site