lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] NFS: fix usage of mempools.
From
Date
Hi Neil,

On 04/09/2017 10:22 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> When passed GFP flags that allow sleeping (such as
> GFP_NOIO), mempool_alloc() will never return NULL, it will
> wait until memory is available.
>
> This means that we don't need to handle failure, but that we
> do need to ensure one thread doesn't call mempool_alloc()
> twice on the one pool without queuing or freeing the first
> allocation. If multiple threads did this during times of
> high memory pressure, the pool could be exhausted and a
> deadlock could result.
>
> pnfs_generic_alloc_ds_commits() attempts to allocate from
> the nfs_commit_mempool while already holding an allocation
> from that pool. This is not safe. So change
> nfs_commitdata_alloc() to take a flag that indicates whether
> failure is acceptable.
>
> In pnfs_generic_alloc_ds_commits(), accept failure and
> handle it as we currently do. Else where, do not accept
> failure, and do not handle it.
>
> Even when failure is acceptable, we want to succeed if
> possible. That means both
> - using an entry from the pool if there is one
> - waiting for direct reclaim is there isn't.
>
> We call mempool_alloc(GFP_NOWAIT) to achieve the first, then
> kmem_cache_alloc(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_NORETRY) to achieve the
> second. Each of these can fail, but together they do the
> best they can without blocking indefinitely.
>
> Also, don't test for failure when allocating from
> nfs_wdata_mempool.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c | 16 +++++-----------
> fs/nfs/write.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> include/linux/nfs_fs.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c
> index 7250b95549ec..1edf5b84aba5 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ pnfs_generic_alloc_ds_commits(struct nfs_commit_info *cinfo,
> for (i = 0; i < fl_cinfo->nbuckets; i++, bucket++) {
> if (list_empty(&bucket->committing))
> continue;
> - data = nfs_commitdata_alloc();
> + data = nfs_commitdata_alloc(false);
> if (!data)
> break;
> data->ds_commit_index = i;
> @@ -283,16 +283,10 @@ pnfs_generic_commit_pagelist(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *mds_pages,
> unsigned int nreq = 0;
>
> if (!list_empty(mds_pages)) {
> - data = nfs_commitdata_alloc();
> - if (data != NULL) {
> - data->ds_commit_index = -1;
> - list_add(&data->pages, &list);
> - nreq++;
> - } else {
> - nfs_retry_commit(mds_pages, NULL, cinfo, 0);
> - pnfs_generic_retry_commit(cinfo, 0);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> + data = nfs_commitdata_alloc(true);
> + data->ds_commit_index = -1;
> + list_add(&data->pages, &list);
> + nreq++;
> }
>
> nreq += pnfs_generic_alloc_ds_commits(cinfo, &list);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
> index abb2c8a3be42..bdfe5a7c5874 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/write.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
> @@ -60,14 +60,28 @@ static mempool_t *nfs_wdata_mempool;
> static struct kmem_cache *nfs_cdata_cachep;
> static mempool_t *nfs_commit_mempool;
>
> -struct nfs_commit_data *nfs_commitdata_alloc(void)
> +struct nfs_commit_data *nfs_commitdata_alloc(bool never_fail)
> {
> - struct nfs_commit_data *p = mempool_alloc(nfs_commit_mempool, GFP_NOIO);
> + struct nfs_commit_data *p;
>
> - if (p) {
> - memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->pages);
> + if (never_fail)
> + p = mempool_alloc(nfs_commit_mempool, GFP_NOIO);
> + else {
> + /* It is OK to do some reclaim, not no safe to wait
> + * for anything to be returned to the pool.
> + * mempool_alloc() cannot handle that particular combination,
> + * so we need two separate attempts.
> + */
> + p = mempool_alloc(nfs_commit_mempool, GFP_NOWAIT);
> + if (!p)
> + p = kmem_cache_alloc(nfs_cdata_cachep, GFP_NOIO |
> + __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY);

Do we need to add something to the nfs_commit_data structure to properly free a kmem_cache_alloc()-ed object? Right now it looks like nfs_commit_free() calls mempool_free() unconditionally.

Thanks,
Anna

> + if (!p)
> + return NULL;
> }
> +
> + memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->pages);
> return p;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_commitdata_alloc);
> @@ -82,8 +96,7 @@ static struct nfs_pgio_header *nfs_writehdr_alloc(void)
> {
> struct nfs_pgio_header *p = mempool_alloc(nfs_wdata_mempool, GFP_NOIO);
>
> - if (p)
> - memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
> + memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
> return p;
> }
>
> @@ -1705,19 +1718,13 @@ nfs_commit_list(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *head, int how,
> if (list_empty(head))
> return 0;
>
> - data = nfs_commitdata_alloc();
> -
> - if (!data)
> - goto out_bad;
> + data = nfs_commitdata_alloc(true);
>
> /* Set up the argument struct */
> nfs_init_commit(data, head, NULL, cinfo);
> atomic_inc(&cinfo->mds->rpcs_out);
> return nfs_initiate_commit(NFS_CLIENT(inode), data, NFS_PROTO(inode),
> data->mds_ops, how, 0);
> - out_bad:
> - nfs_retry_commit(head, NULL, cinfo, 0);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> int nfs_commit_file(struct file *file, struct nfs_write_verifier *verf)
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> index 287f34161086..1b29915247b2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ extern int nfs_wb_all(struct inode *inode);
> extern int nfs_wb_single_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page, bool launder);
> extern int nfs_wb_page_cancel(struct inode *inode, struct page* page);
> extern int nfs_commit_inode(struct inode *, int);
> -extern struct nfs_commit_data *nfs_commitdata_alloc(void);
> +extern struct nfs_commit_data *nfs_commitdata_alloc(bool never_fail);
> extern void nfs_commit_free(struct nfs_commit_data *data);
>
> static inline int
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-10 22:23    [W:0.038 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site