Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Date | Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:38:23 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: w90x900: let clk_disable() return immediately if clk is NULL |
| |
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote: > In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL > pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions. > > Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call > clk_disable() without NULL pointer check. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> > Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@gmail.com> > ---
Applied to next/fixes-non-critical in arm-soc, I don't think anybody else was going to apply it. Thanks!
Arnd
| |