lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: w90x900: let clk_disable() return immediately if clk is NULL
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
> In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
> pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
>
> Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
> clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
> ---

Applied to next/fixes-non-critical in arm-soc, I don't think anybody else
was going to apply it. Thanks!

Arnd

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-30 17:39    [W:0.079 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site