Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Wendy Liang <> | Subject | [RFC LINUX PATCH 15/19] remoteproc: virtio: rename rproc_virtio_notify to rproc_vq_notify | Date | Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:22:31 -0700 |
| |
From: Wendy Liang <wendy.liang@xilinx.com>
rproc_virtio_notify() is to notify about the virtqueue changes but not the virtio dev and thus rename to rproc_vq_notify(). It will need another API for virtio dev notification.
Signed-off-by: Wendy Liang <jliang@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c index 577344e..cc421f3 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ #include "remoteproc_internal.h" /* kick the remote processor, and let it know which virtqueue to poke at */ -static bool rproc_virtio_notify(struct virtqueue *vq) +static bool rproc_vq_notify(struct virtqueue *vq) { struct rproc_vring *rvring = vq->priv; struct rproc *rproc = rvring->rvdev->rproc; @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *rp_find_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, * the 'weak' smp barriers, since we're talking with a real device. */ vq = vring_new_virtqueue(id, len, rvring->align, vdev, false, addr, - rproc_virtio_notify, callback, name); + rproc_vq_notify, callback, name); if (!vq) { dev_err(dev, "vring_new_virtqueue %s failed\n", name); rproc_free_vring(rvring); -- 1.9.1
| |