lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/7] ath9k: Add support for reading the EEPROM data using the nvmem API
Date
On Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:43:28 PM CET Alban wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:53:55 +0100
> Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, March 13, 2017 10:05:11 PM CET Alban wrote:
> > > Currently SoC platforms use a firmware request to get the EEPROM data.
> > > This is mostly a hack and rely on using a user-helper scripts which is
> > > deprecated. A nicer alternative is to use the nvmem API which was
> > > designed for this kind of task.
> > >
> > > Furthermore we let CONFIG_ATH9K_AHB select CONFIG_NVMEM as such
> > > devices will generally use this method for loading the EEPROM data.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alban <albeu@free.fr>
> > > ---
> > > @@ -654,6 +656,25 @@ static int ath9k_init_softc(u16 devid, struct ath_softc *sc,
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > + /* If the EEPROM hasn't been retrieved via firmware request
> > > + * use the nvmem API insted.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!ah->eeprom_blob) {
> > > + struct nvmem_cell *eeprom_cell;
> > > +
> > > + eeprom_cell = nvmem_cell_get(ah->dev, "eeprom");
> > > + if (!IS_ERR(eeprom_cell)) {
> > > + ah->eeprom_data = nvmem_cell_read(
> > > + eeprom_cell, &ah->eeprom_size);
> > > + nvmem_cell_put(eeprom_cell);
> > > +
> > > + if (IS_ERR(ah->eeprom_data)) {
> > > + dev_err(ah->dev, "failed to read eeprom");
> > > + return PTR_ERR(ah->eeprom_data);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (ath9k_led_active_high != -1)
> > > ah->config.led_active_high = ath9k_led_active_high == 1;
> > >
> > Are you sure this works with AR93XX SoCs that have the calibration data
> > in the OTP?
>
> I only tested this on an ar9132 platform, so it might well be that a
> few things are missing for the newer SoC. However this shouldn't break
> anything existing as a platform needs to define an nvmem cell on the
> athk9 device for this code to be used a all.

Yes, I looked at it.
+ eeprom_cell = nvmem_cell_get(ah->dev, "eeprom");
+ if (!IS_ERR(eeprom_cell)) {
+ ...
+ }
So if there's a error with the "eeprom" nvmem property,
(i.e.: it's not present) the driver should works as before.

Thanks,
Christian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-24 17:25    [W:0.055 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site