lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2]L2TP:Adjust intf MTU, add underlay L3, L2 hdrs
[Posting a v4 patch-set shortly based on additional code review
comments received in internal review, please disregard the v3 patches]

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:33 PM, R. Parameswaran
<parameswaran.r7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> In existing kernel code, when setting up the L2TP interface, all of the
> tunnel encapsulation headers are not taken into account when setting
> up the MTU on the L2TP logical interface device. Due to this, the
> packets created by the applications on top of the L2TP layer are larger
> than they ought to be, relative to the underlay MTU, which leads to
> needless fragmentation once the L2TP packet is encapsulated in an outer IP
> packet.
>
> Specifically, the MTU calculation does not take into account the (outer)
> IP header imposed on the encapsulated L2TP packet, and the Layer 2 header
> imposed on the inner L2TP packet prior to encapsulation. The patch posted
> here takes care of these.
>
> Existing code also seems to assume an Ethernet (non-jumbo) underlay. The
> patch uses the PMTU mechanism and the dst entry in the L2TP tunnel socket
> to directly pull up the underlay MTU (as the baseline number on top of
> which the encapsulation headers are factored in). Ethernet MTU is
> assumed as a fallback only if this fails.
>
> Picked up review comments from James Chapman, added a function
> to compute ip header + ip option overhead on a socket, and factored it
> into L2TP change-set.
>
> Signed-off-by: R. Parameswaran <rparames@brocade.com>
> ---
> include/linux/net.h | 3 +++
> net/socket.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/net.h b/include/linux/net.h
> index 0620f5e..a42fab2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/net.h
> +++ b/include/linux/net.h
> @@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ int kernel_sendpage(struct socket *sock, struct page *page, int offset,
> int kernel_sock_ioctl(struct socket *sock, int cmd, unsigned long arg);
> int kernel_sock_shutdown(struct socket *sock, enum sock_shutdown_cmd how);
>
> +/* Following routine returns the IP overhead imposed by a socket. */
> +u32 kernel_sock_ip_overhead(struct sock *sk);
> +
> #define MODULE_ALIAS_NETPROTO(proto) \
> MODULE_ALIAS("net-pf-" __stringify(proto))
>
> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index e034fe4..af54b12 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/net/socket.c
> @@ -3345,3 +3345,44 @@ int kernel_sock_shutdown(struct socket *sock, enum sock_shutdown_cmd how)
> return sock->ops->shutdown(sock, how);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_sock_shutdown);
> +
> +/* This routine returns the IP overhead imposed by a socket i.e.
> + * the length of the underlying IP header, depending on whether
> + * this is an IPv4 or IPv6 socket and the length from IP options turned
> + * on at the socket.
> + */
> +u32 kernel_sock_ip_overhead(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + struct inet_sock *inet;
> + struct ipv6_pinfo *np;
> + struct ip_options_rcu *opt = NULL;
> + struct ipv6_txoptions *optv6 = NULL;
> + u32 overhead = 0;
> + bool owned_by_user = sock_owned_by_user(sk);
> +
> + if (!sk)
> + return overhead;
> + switch (sk->sk_family) {
> + case AF_INET:
> + inet = inet_sk(sk);
> + overhead += sizeof(struct iphdr);
> + if (inet)
> + opt = rcu_dereference_protected(inet->inet_opt,
> + owned_by_user);
> + if (opt)
> + overhead += opt->opt.optlen;
> + return overhead;
> + case AF_INET6:
> + np = inet6_sk(sk);
> + overhead += sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
> + if (np)
> + optv6 = rcu_dereference_protected(np->opt,
> + owned_by_user);
> + if (optv6)
> + overhead += (optv6->opt_flen + optv6->opt_nflen);
> + return overhead;
> + default: /* Returns 0 overhead if the socket is not ipv4 or ipv6 */
> + return overhead;
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_sock_ip_overhead);
> --
> 2.1.4
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-18 03:20    [W:0.038 / U:0.748 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site