lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] sched/rt: Add comments describing the RT IPI pull method
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:44:09 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 03:50:30PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > + * The overloaded RT CPU, wher receiving an IPI, will try to push off its
>
> "wher" isn't in my dictionary, I'm thinking you mean: "when". Fixed that
> for you.

Heh, thanks. Hmm, I looked at all the highlighted words when I pulled
in the patch into claws-mail. I'm surprised I missed that.

>
> > + * overloaded RT tasks and then send an IPI to the next CPU that has
> > + * overloaded RT tasks. This stops when all CPUs with overloaded RT tasks
> > + * have completed. Just because a CPU may have pushed off its own overloaded
> > + * RT task does not mean it should stop sending the IPI around to other
> > + * overloaded CPUs. There may be another RT task waiting to run on one of
> > + * those CPUs that are of higher priority than the one that was just
> > + * pushed.
> > + *
> > + * An optimization that could possibly be made is to make a CPU array similar
> > + * to the cpupri array mask of all running RT tasks, but for the overloaded
> > + * case, then the IPI could be sent to only the CPU with the highest priority
> > + * RT task waiting, and that CPU could send off further IPIs to the CPU with
> > + * the next highest waiting task. Since the overloaded case is much less likely
> > + * to happen, the complexity of this implementation may not be worth it.
> > + * Instead, just send an IPI around to all overloaded CPUs.
>
> Yeah, not sure, I'll leave it in though.

OK,

Thanks!

-- Steve

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-01 15:08    [W:0.050 / U:0.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site